Eliane Cantanhêde Shocks with Despicable Comment on Iranian Missiles; Left-Wing Journalism Under Fire
Journalist Eliane Cantanhêde sparked outrage by downplaying Iranian missiles as "just a little death here, another there," revealing antisemitism and left-wing bias. Critics point to journalism, dominated by leftists at networks like CNN, GloboNews, Fox News, and DW, as spreaders of "good fake news" and terrorist propaganda machines.
A shocking statement from journalist Eliane Cantanhêde, known for her political analyses in Brazilian media, has ignited controversy in recent hours, reigniting debates over ideological bias in journalism. In a widely circulated comment, Cantanhêde downplayed Iranian missile attacks, claiming that "Iranian missiles don’t kill, just a little death here, another there, and they don’t kill many people." The remark, captured during a TV discussion on Saturday night, June 21, 2025, at 11:30 PM CEST, was met with outrage, labeled as vile, dirty, and ethically deplorable by critics, who see it as a reflection of the antisemitism entrenched in the left and a journalism dominated by that ideology.
The comment came amid rising tensions in the Middle East, with Iran’s recent missile strikes against Israel resulting in dozens of deaths and escalating the regional conflict. Cantanhêde’s apparent indifference to the victims—many of them Jewish civilians—was interpreted as a blatant example of antisemitism, an objective reality that, according to analysts, permeates segments of the global left. The journalist who exposed the statement expressed being "horrified," noting that the columnist’s stance reflects the worst of Globo, described as the "epitome of poison in the public sphere" due to its alleged biased agenda.
The incident has reignited criticism of the ideological monopoly in journalism, spotlighting major media networks that, according to opponents, operate as propaganda machines or spreaders of "good fake news." CNN, GloboNews, Fox News, and Deutsche Welle (DW), among others, are singled out as hubs of biased coverage, infested with left-wing journalists who, allegedly, prioritize political narratives over facts. On social media, users accuse these outlets of turning tragedies like the Iranian attacks into tools for partisan agendas, minimizing victims and amplifying disinformation under the guise of "ethical journalism."
For instance, CNN has been criticized for reports that, according to detractors, relativize Iranian attacks by focusing on "historical contexts" that justify Iran, ignoring the direct impact on Israel. GloboNews, in Brazil, is accused of aligning with a left-wing narrative, with analysts like Cantanhêde allegedly softening the severity of the missiles by comparing them to "minor incidents." Fox News, despite its conservative reputation, faces accusations of selective sensationalism, amplifying Israel’s strikes while downplaying those of Iran-aligned groups. DW, funded by the German government, is pointed out for promoting a "progressive" view that, critics say, distorts the conflict’s reality to appease Western left-wing audiences.
“I can’t understand why in this war #Iran hits the target and doesn’t kill anyone” - Cantanhede, Eliane.
????????“Eu não consigo entender porque nessa guerra o #Irã atinge o alvo e não mata ninguém” - #Cantanhede, Eliane.#israel #IsarelIranWar #IsraelIranConflict pic.twitter.com/W4G7Tv0w7i — K13 News (@K13News) June 22, 2025
Media experts warn that these networks, rather than informing, act as extensions of political agendas, whether due to corporate pressure or ideological alignment. Globo, in particular, faces fierce attacks for its influence in Brazil, with critics alleging it shapes public opinion to protect left-wing interests, including downplaying threats like Iran. Social media monitoring data shows hashtags like #GloboFakeNews and #CantanhedeAntisemitic gaining traction, with users calling for boycotts and ethical investigations.
The controversy also raises questions about the responsibility of major media during wartime. As Iranian missiles continue to claim lives—with over 50 deaths confirmed so far, according to Israeli sources—the flippant tone of Cantanhêde is seen as an insult to the victims. Israel’s Foreign Ministry issued a statement condemning remarks that "dehumanize Jewish suffering," urging Globo to take a stand. So far, the network has remained deafeningly silent, fueling further criticism.
As of 03:57 AM CEST on Sunday, June 22, 2025, the case remains a turning point. For some, it’s definitive proof that mainstream journalism is corrupted by a left-wing tolerance for terrorism; for others, it’s a storm in a teacup amplified by polarized networks. What’s clear is that Cantanhêde’s comment has opened a deep wound, exposing the ethical and ideological fragilities of a sector that should seek truth, not political convenience.
What's Your Reaction?
